Pet peeve/rant
Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:04 amPedant hat - on!
I am not a 'hun'. Still less am I a 'hunny'. What *is* a 'hunny' anyway? It's something Winnie-the-Pooh eats, I think. I am not a substance consumed by fictional characters. Neither am I a 'hon', or a 'honny'. If I am anything remotely like this, I am a 'honey'. What, for crying out loud, is wrong with the standard spelling of that word? What? H O N E Y. Like the thing that bees make. Which is sweet and delicious. Which are the attributes that, in this particular use of metaphor, one is applying to the person thus described. Honey, therefore, is appropriate. Hunny, and any other mind-bogglingly redundant variations or abbreviations, are not appropriate, since those Are Not Words, and therefore Do Not Carry The Same Connotations.
I don't much like being called 'hon' in speech, either. It annoys me. Mostly because I can hear people spelling it 'hun' and I am definitely not one of the horde of Attila. So there.
Pedant hat - removed!
I am not a 'hun'. Still less am I a 'hunny'. What *is* a 'hunny' anyway? It's something Winnie-the-Pooh eats, I think. I am not a substance consumed by fictional characters. Neither am I a 'hon', or a 'honny'. If I am anything remotely like this, I am a 'honey'. What, for crying out loud, is wrong with the standard spelling of that word? What? H O N E Y. Like the thing that bees make. Which is sweet and delicious. Which are the attributes that, in this particular use of metaphor, one is applying to the person thus described. Honey, therefore, is appropriate. Hunny, and any other mind-bogglingly redundant variations or abbreviations, are not appropriate, since those Are Not Words, and therefore Do Not Carry The Same Connotations.
I don't much like being called 'hon' in speech, either. It annoys me. Mostly because I can hear people spelling it 'hun' and I am definitely not one of the horde of Attila. So there.
Pedant hat - removed!
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:17 am (UTC)Will try to avoid doing so in future, sorry!
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:23 am (UTC)no subject
Not necessarily. You have just given me the idea of calling someone 'honey' to indicate that they are clingy, sticky, viscous and prone to mould. I might have to start using that :-)
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:11 am (UTC)Kath
*knower of almost as much esoteric (read extraneous, random and crap) knowledge as RBS*
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:06 pm (UTC)Hon: I'll never read Hansard in quite the same way again, :).
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 03:35 pm (UTC)And yes, in that context being called a Hun is shorthand for: orangesectarianracistviciousb*****d
Whilst Celt (where c=s) is rarely used unless you support Celtic, otherwise you would use either
a) fenian c**t (if a 'Hun')
b) one of the Bhoys (if a Celtic fan who's mildy into sectarianism)
c) Tim (moderately affectionate term used by those who aren't sectarian but make jokes about it... when they know no-one else is about, although the source of the term is as much to do with the old name for the neutral fans' bit of Parkhead as was as anything else)
NB: all of the above, if prefixed with "those b*****d/f*****g/expletive ad infinitum actually then translate as:
"I support Partick Thistle, they just scored a goal against us... as usual" ; )
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 03:42 pm (UTC)hon
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 04:20 pm (UTC)Btw, what's it like working for 'The Labour Group'? ... not that I'm looking at new jobs and such a position might be coming up?
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 06:18 pm (UTC)Oh btw, are you on the YL yahoogroup? Two amusing posts out of the last three (unless there were any this afternoon) and the one in between was me being nice.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 6 May 2004 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Friday, 7 May 2004 09:37 pm (UTC)Sorry hun.. er. sweetz... err babs.. er LUCY!