"Bisexual and gay" O RLY?
Thursday, 16 April 2009 11:48 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Dear Livejournal,
Please help me enumerate the multifarious ways that this article is made of wrong. My brain has shut down in horror.
Please help me enumerate the multifarious ways that this article is made of wrong. My brain has shut down in horror.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 11:06 am (UTC)Oh, stuff it, blame them as well. And Jackie Clune, she can shove right off.
I remember reading a rather obnoxious Theobald article, possibly the one she references. It was in a book about how feminism is still relevant, directed at young women (I can't identify which, I'm afraid) - joyful to know that someone's first introduction to useful ideas such as wage equality and the double standard will include a meditation on the unethics of bisexuality.
I'm going to write Theobald a letter and see if she'll donate to Bi presences at UK prides this year.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 11:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 11:27 am (UTC)I'm not sure I'm the best person, as I've been annoyed at Theobald for about a decade, and I've not read any Arnott, but I'll have a think about it.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 11:20 am (UTC)I guess if you're going to allow your politics to define or redefine your sexuality then you're pretty well doomed to fail from the start (whether those political ideas are religiofascist homophobia, militant feminism, or anything else you can think of). So whilst that "traitor mentality" towards bisexuality is bafflingly idiotic (why fight against one discrimination in order to replace it with another?), it's also terribly predictable (since any small fringe group will quickly develop strong in-group/out-group markers).
no subject
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 11:24 am (UTC)My brain has shut down too.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 11:28 am (UTC)G
no subject
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 11:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 11:59 am (UTC)G
no subject
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 11:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 01:24 pm (UTC)Never trust a woman with egg on her face, eh?
no subject
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 01:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Friday, 17 April 2009 01:46 pm (UTC)I find continuing bigotry slightly surprising and would normally expect that unless you live in a lesbian ghetto, it's difficult to avoid exposure to different lifestyles and viewpoints if you are even vaguely scene.
There's also (hopefully) the point where people start judging both their own and other viewpoints and discover quite how many are flawed and self serving.
Even the straight community gets exposed to sufficient diversity for people to note life might consist of shades of grey rather than primary colours.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 04:21 pm (UTC)At any rate, the article seems, overall, to be reasonably decent press for the B. There are points of criticism, but from such a source, I expected far worse.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 06:33 pm (UTC)Feh?
Date: Thursday, 16 April 2009 07:33 pm (UTC)I was going to comment, but this is admirably succinct :P
no subject
Date: Friday, 17 April 2009 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 2 June 2009 04:48 pm (UTC)