Tiny mini-rant
A swift rant about something driving me nuts on and off at the moment.
Kittens. People. Two different things.
You are not a kitten. Your friends and social group are not kittens. Bisexuals are not kittens. Only kittens, young instances of the animal commonly called a cat, are, in fact, kittens. Please remember this. Thank you.
Kittens. People. Two different things.
You are not a kitten. Your friends and social group are not kittens. Bisexuals are not kittens. Only kittens, young instances of the animal commonly called a cat, are, in fact, kittens. Please remember this. Thank you.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I loosely agree with you on the above rant though.
As I'm going off at tangents, there's a sign on the way to work that is killing me at the moment. It's a menu at a cafe, on which they manage to spell chilli as chile. The thought of being served thousands of square miles of south america for lunch scares me. It's quite cheaply priced, but I suppose they'd make a profit from the amount you'd have to spend on drinks to wash it down with.
no subject
no subject
I wouldn't say you're not laid-back enough. I think (and please let me take the opportunity to remind you, and myself, and the viewers at home [hi everybody] that I don't really know you that well, so what I think is based on a remarkably small selection of observations which, whilst perhaps individually astute, may combine to form erroneous conclusions) that the things you react to in this way are things that you, on some level, take very personally.
I'm not sure of the exact word to describe it, but possessive is possibly closest (yet still vastly inaccurate, so please don't hit me) in the sense that you're quite protective of the opinions you form of them, and certainly in the case of the whole spelling/grammar/punctuation package, you act as if people's misuse of them, and contravention of standard rules of application, will somehow damage your language.
I will, once again, reiterate that I may, in all likelyhood, have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about, and that the opinions expressed above are Whacked-out Deductions from Rikk's Whacked-out Brain™, and that should you take exception to them, please try to not take them seriously, or in the absence of a fist of salt.
no subject
There are other things too, but the one I am thinking of is way too complicated to explain.
Crappy spelling etc. does damage my language. Not my language as in the actual words I speak or write - someone's use of 'ur' for 'your' isn't going to infect my brain while I sleep and cause me to wake up thinking in netspeak - but rather in a more general sense. It's that if such things go unchallenged, slowly 'ur mah bestest buddie an i luv u 4eva' will become more and more acceptable and mainstream, and interesting, useful, attractive, beautiful parts of the language will vanish. Already, 'flaunt' and 'flout' which are different words with different meanings, are becoming conflated because people use them wrongly.
All languages evolve, but I'd prefer not to see English evolve into sumth1n lyke di5, y0.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
thats thier opinions n stuff...
opinions are never wrong, you just don't have to agree with them
no subject
My pet peeve is "its" versus "it's". That, and when people do stuff like "I want this approved by Jim and myself," which makes the speaker sound both pompous and stupid, which is no mean feat.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Granted, a lot of things do nudge me the wrong way, but that is something I'm trying to eliminate.
no subject